Posts
5
Joined
6/12/2019
Location
Beverly Hills, CA
US
Edited Date/Time
6/15/2019 11:52pm
Hey, GuyB here.
Well, another day, another thread way off the rails. I'm in the process of doing a little garbage clean-up where moto should be. Instead, we have a bunch of guys sitting on the sidelines for wishing death on someone (admittedly a scummy thief...allegedly), and others dropping some racist nonsense.
While the original video did have a bike in it, did we really need to see it? Especially since it looks like the poster created an account just to post this.
Let's get back to moto, shall we?
Well, another day, another thread way off the rails. I'm in the process of doing a little garbage clean-up where moto should be. Instead, we have a bunch of guys sitting on the sidelines for wishing death on someone (admittedly a scummy thief...allegedly), and others dropping some racist nonsense.
While the original video did have a bike in it, did we really need to see it? Especially since it looks like the poster created an account just to post this.
Let's get back to moto, shall we?
I guess my question was the law aspect...not what my actual intentions would be...cause i could easily see myself doing the exact same thing as the guy in the video.
The Shop
"After listing a motorcycle for sale online, the sellers, a father and a son, agreed to meet a buyer in the Lake Shore Plaza parking lot at the corner of Portion and Cenacle roads in Lake Ronkonkoma to complete the sale at about 3:30 p.m., Suffolk Police said. The buyer didn't pay, but instead assaulted the father and attempted to leave with the motorcycle, police said."
"He hit my dad with a hammer"
https://twitter.com/Stringernews/status/1137230443269505024
Just a teenager who was probably shocked seeing someone attack his dad..and wanted some justice.
Why are they referring to the dipshit as a "buyer" and not the "thief"
The suspect tried to steal a bike, but did so using force (hammer), which means it’s a robbery (force plus theft) and a deadly weapon. This makes it a BARRK felony (Burglary, Arson, Robbery, Rape, Kidnapping). These are the most heinous of violent/dangerous crimes other than murder. As a result, use of force threshold to prevent them and/or prevent the flight of the suspect is higher with these crimes.
In addition, the suspect wasn’t riding or walking away when he got whacked, he was RE-engaging the victim (kid). Further, he may or may not have the hammer still, but that’s irrelevant as he has already used one deadly weapon and may have others on his person.
CRIMINALLY, I’d hope that the kid is cleared as self-defense.
Unfortunately, CIVILLY I am sure the turds family, who probably wanted nothing to do with him to this point, will suddenly be the “grieving family” whose son/dad/brother/cousin “didn’t do nothin”...
but then i wouldnt be proud of it, let alone cheer like a keyboard cowboy...
THAT BEING SAID.. if I was in the same situation I probably would have done the same thing. I think the kid will be ok, he just reacted poorly and will probably get a scare going through court etc.
Pit Row
It cannot be overlooked that the son made an excited utterance of “he hit my dad with a hammer.” He didn’t say “he tried to steal my bike”. Big insight into what the state of mind of the son was.
The shithead chose the outcome with his actions.
There is a reason why we have a criminal justice system. Those of you calling for Street Justice are no better than the wheelie boyz who ignore the criminal justice system and solve issues with street violence.
The would-be thief deserves his day in court, not death. Unless you just want to throw the entire bill of rights out the window, because that is exactly what you are cheering for in this situation.
I suppose if it was you and your father, friend, etc. you would have just stood to the side, let them get assaulted while you do nothing but call 911. You know, because justice system and all.
GTFO here man.
Post a reply to: Dirt bike thief gets conked in the head with a loading ramp