Ping Sad Ken Didn’t Thank Him

moto111 wrote:

Without having to read through all this drivel, is Vital cancelling Ping ?

moto111 wrote:

Without having to read through all this drivel, is Vital cancelling Ping ?

Richy wrote:

I hear people say it every five minutes but what does that even mean in reality? If someone is a piece, and you don't want to...

I hear people say it every five minutes but what does that even mean in reality?

If someone is a piece, and you don't want to have to deal with it, does that count? Is closing the door on some dipshit 'cancelling' them, or is it just preserving your own sanity?

moto111 wrote:

Without having to read through all this drivel, is Vital cancelling Ping ?

Richy wrote:

I hear people say it every five minutes but what does that even mean in reality? If someone is a piece, and you don't want to...

I hear people say it every five minutes but what does that even mean in reality?

If someone is a piece, and you don't want to have to deal with it, does that count? Is closing the door on some dipshit 'cancelling' them, or is it just preserving your own sanity?

MJC wrote:

Exactly. That flog Ping well and truly “cancelled” himself. 

moto111 wrote:

So then yes, Vital is cancelling Ping. I just need to know so I can follow what the other Vitard sheep do. 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT. You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his...

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT.

You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his close associates and the citizens of NY back then unless you had done your homework and had read about or studied DJT to know what an abject failure he was/is at business and how racist his and his father's views were.

HOWEVER.....Now that he’s had 6 yrs or whatever to actually demonstrate his level of incompetence, and disloyalty to the US, his undemocratic authoritarian leanings, his support of dictators and despots, his outright disdain for the rule of law and his attempt to weaponize the DOJ then project the same, his constant losing then whining about it and inciting his MAGA lemmings, not to mention his racist views....if you're still with him as I assume Ping is (yes I'm assuming) – Well, no more mulligans.  

If you support someone that’s openly racist, misogynist, anti-American, undemocratic (I forgot jingoistic) what does that make you? If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what??  He’s a racist fascist duck.  It may be a fine line but no more mulligans.  Sorry if this triggers, or offends you or Ping.  It is what it is.
NFM

PFitzG38 wrote:

Exactly 99% of the people I ride with have diff political views than I do. They are my race buddies and I would do anything for...

Exactly 99% of the people I ride with have diff political views than I do. They are my race buddies and I would do anything for them including lend them $ and parts to race and beat me.  As long as we don’t talk politics we’re fine.  Although most of them know whatever daily spin they try and bring up around me I can usually easily debunk or make them look pretty foolish by just using their own words or just simply explaining the FOL to them

Lawn Snob wrote:

Ping is not a racist or fascist. Debunk that and make me look foolish. I want FACTS, not your opinion. 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT. You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his...

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT.

You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his close associates and the citizens of NY back then unless you had done your homework and had read about or studied DJT to know what an abject failure he was/is at business and how racist his and his father's views were.

HOWEVER.....Now that he’s had 6 yrs or whatever to actually demonstrate his level of incompetence, and disloyalty to the US, his undemocratic authoritarian leanings, his support of dictators and despots, his outright disdain for the rule of law and his attempt to weaponize the DOJ then project the same, his constant losing then whining about it and inciting his MAGA lemmings, not to mention his racist views....if you're still with him as I assume Ping is (yes I'm assuming) – Well, no more mulligans.  

If you support someone that’s openly racist, misogynist, anti-American, undemocratic (I forgot jingoistic) what does that make you? If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what??  He’s a racist fascist duck.  It may be a fine line but no more mulligans.  Sorry if this triggers, or offends you or Ping.  It is what it is.
NFM

RACERX69 wrote:

 

 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Exactly 99% of the people I ride with have diff political views than I do. They are my race buddies and I would do anything for...

Exactly 99% of the people I ride with have diff political views than I do. They are my race buddies and I would do anything for them including lend them $ and parts to race and beat me.  As long as we don’t talk politics we’re fine.  Although most of them know whatever daily spin they try and bring up around me I can usually easily debunk or make them look pretty foolish by just using their own words or just simply explaining the FOL to them

Lawn Snob wrote:

Ping is not a racist or fascist. Debunk that and make me look foolish. I want FACTS, not your opinion. 

McG194 wrote:

Once someone uses the argument that another is a racist and a fascist, I realize they are an idiot, and the debate is over. 

ATKpilot99 wrote:

Non moto

PFitzG38 wrote:

Funny how long ML kept this on the main page.

Gee, I wonder why😂

ML512 wrote:

Because according to Ping I am "Lord of the Idiots". You reap what you sew.

PFitzG38 wrote:

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT. You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his...

Facts!?  What a novel concept.  here's a FACT.

You get a mulligan back before DJT originally ran for office.  It was only common knowledge among his close associates and the citizens of NY back then unless you had done your homework and had read about or studied DJT to know what an abject failure he was/is at business and how racist his and his father's views were.

HOWEVER.....Now that he’s had 6 yrs or whatever to actually demonstrate his level of incompetence, and disloyalty to the US, his undemocratic authoritarian leanings, his support of dictators and despots, his outright disdain for the rule of law and his attempt to weaponize the DOJ then project the same, his constant losing then whining about it and inciting his MAGA lemmings, not to mention his racist views....if you're still with him as I assume Ping is (yes I'm assuming) – Well, no more mulligans.  

If you support someone that’s openly racist, misogynist, anti-American, undemocratic (I forgot jingoistic) what does that make you? If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what??  He’s a racist fascist duck.  It may be a fine line but no more mulligans.  Sorry if this triggers, or offends you or Ping.  It is what it is.
NFM

RACERX69 wrote:

 

 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Yes yes I understand. Ad hominem attacks when you can’t cogently dispute anything I said.

Classic vital

RACERX69 wrote:

 

 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Yes yes I understand. Ad hominem attacks when you can’t cogently dispute anything I said.

Classic vital

RACERX69 wrote:

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read...

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read, sir!! 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Funny how long ML kept this on the main page.

Gee, I wonder why😂

ML512 wrote:

Because according to Ping I am "Lord of the Idiots". You reap what you sew.

PFitzG38 wrote:

Yes yes I understand. Ad hominem attacks when you can’t cogently dispute anything I said.

Classic vital

RACERX69 wrote:

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read...

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read, sir!! 

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

RACERX69 wrote:

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment.  I've read your comments over the years in Non...

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment. 

I've read your comments over the years in Non Moto and it's quite obvious you're part of the problem and not the solution. Arguing with someone such as yourself would be inane and a substantial waste of time.

cya 

 

RACERX69 wrote:

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read...

Pfft.. Cogent??? TFF coming from one who attempts an argument utilizing nothing but rehashed mainstream media/DNC talking points. Nice work! It's plainly transparent you're well read, sir!! 

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

3 Tres wrote:

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of...

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of meth version of the stone age.

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

3 Tres wrote:

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of...

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of meth version of the stone age.

PFitzG38 wrote:

Do you have a point or just yelling from the peanut gallery?  No, I don’t stroke to Socialist politicians, and I certainly don’t agree with some...

Do you have a point or just yelling from the peanut gallery?  No, I don’t stroke to Socialist politicians, and I certainly don’t agree with some left-coast policies. (but probably not the ones you're scared of)  However, ask yourself this.....honostly.  Let's say the boogie man was real and your worst political fears came true.  Would you rather live under an Authoritarian Dictatorship or a Socialist Democracy?  Jus sayn’

3 Tres wrote:

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of...

Haha, says the guy that strokes off to the socialist politicians that are actively taking alot of the west coast cities back into some sort of meth version of the stone age.

PFitzG38 wrote:

Do you have a point or just yelling from the peanut gallery?  No, I don’t stroke to Socialist politicians, and I certainly don’t agree with some...

Do you have a point or just yelling from the peanut gallery?  No, I don’t stroke to Socialist politicians, and I certainly don’t agree with some left-coast policies. (but probably not the ones you're scared of)  However, ask yourself this.....honostly.  Let's say the boogie man was real and your worst political fears came true.  Would you rather live under an Authoritarian Dictatorship or a Socialist Democracy?  Jus sayn’

3 Tres wrote:

Shit option A or shit option B. I'll stick with a constitutional republic.

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

RACERX69 wrote:

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment.  I've read your comments over the years in Non...

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment. 

I've read your comments over the years in Non Moto and it's quite obvious you're part of the problem and not the solution. Arguing with someone such as yourself would be inane and a substantial waste of time.

cya 

 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Lol Classic projection!  It actually looks like you’re the one missing the sarcasm.  I was perfectly aware you were mocking me (since you can’t seem to...

Lol Classic projection!  It actually looks like you’re the one missing the sarcasm.  I was perfectly aware you were mocking me (since you can’t seem to cogently make your point) – there’s that word again, hence my comment “It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing“  reading comprehension much???

You must have me confused with someone else.  I almost NEVER post in Non-Moto, in fact, I just did a search of my feed cause I thought I may have a week or so ago and I can’t find one post.  Can you??  Or are you just making more noise?  I never make political posts I only respond and I do not suffer fools nearly as well as I once did.

I notice you haven’t been able to dispute one point I’ve made with any sense of adult commentary.  I’m actually giving you multiple opportunities with an open mind to make your point.  But you continue to lash out and you, as you say just want to “argue” for some reason??  Are you mad bro?  You have to ask yourself,  Could that actually be part of the problem?  Commenting or forming opinions without doing research?  Can YOU think of a solution?

RACERX69 wrote:

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment.  I've read your comments over the years in Non...

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment. 

I've read your comments over the years in Non Moto and it's quite obvious you're part of the problem and not the solution. Arguing with someone such as yourself would be inane and a substantial waste of time.

cya 

 

PFitzG38 wrote:

Lol Classic projection!  It actually looks like you’re the one missing the sarcasm.  I was perfectly aware you were mocking me (since you can’t seem to...

Lol Classic projection!  It actually looks like you’re the one missing the sarcasm.  I was perfectly aware you were mocking me (since you can’t seem to cogently make your point) – there’s that word again, hence my comment “It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing“  reading comprehension much???

You must have me confused with someone else.  I almost NEVER post in Non-Moto, in fact, I just did a search of my feed cause I thought I may have a week or so ago and I can’t find one post.  Can you??  Or are you just making more noise?  I never make political posts I only respond and I do not suffer fools nearly as well as I once did.

I notice you haven’t been able to dispute one point I’ve made with any sense of adult commentary.  I’m actually giving you multiple opportunities with an open mind to make your point.  But you continue to lash out and you, as you say just want to “argue” for some reason??  Are you mad bro?  You have to ask yourself,  Could that actually be part of the problem?  Commenting or forming opinions without doing research?  Can YOU think of a solution?

Motoxdoc wrote:

OK, that’s just funny!  RACERX took a sarcastic shot at you, you lobbed it back, and he missed it! Only on Vital would someone consider being "well...

OK, that’s just funny!  RACERX took a sarcastic shot at you, you lobbed it back, and he missed it! Only on Vital would someone consider being "well read" as an insult.

BTW, I would take a socialistic democracy over an authoritarian dictatorship any day!  As for the conservatives who say, "I'll stick with a constitutional republic"....The problem with that is, that is NOT what the conservative party is offering.  The conservative party is offering us DJT, and he wants to change the constitution to allow him to be like the despots that he so admires: Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, Rodrigo Duterte, Xi Jinping, Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi.  When DJT tells you who he is, who he likes and what he wants to be...since he's trying to regain control of our country, it would behoove you to listen! 

PFitzG38 wrote:

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like...

I’m just curious.  What rehashed “talking points” exactly are you referring to that you can cogently dispute?  Or do you just want to make noise like most of the GOP these days instead of get your point across?  It should be easy for you since as you say “I utilize nothing but”.

It almost sounds like your saying being well-read is a bad thing.  Not surprising coming from someone who supports a party that seems to want to take us back to the times when religion and or big government controls what or even if we could read.  Don’t fucking tread on ME!!

RACERX69 wrote:

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment.  I've read your comments over the years in Non...

Oopsie, that one sailed right over your pointy little noggin....  "Well read" wasn't meant as a compliment. 

I've read your comments over the years in Non Moto and it's quite obvious you're part of the problem and not the solution. Arguing with someone such as yourself would be inane and a substantial waste of time.

cya