2022 YZ’s

Herb Eaversmells
Edited Date/Time 6/21/2021 4:41pm
YZ 300 2 stroke

I WISH

3
15
|
eric513anderson 6/21/2021 12:45pm
6/21/2021 12:45pm
Herb Eaversmells wrote:
YZ 300 2 stroke I WISH [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2021/06/21/498841/s1200_3452916C_1E13_4232_BC93_3F2436F0A88F.jpg[/img]
YZ 300 2 stroke

I WISH

I just want the YZ 250 in that 14-18 generation frame
2
1
FGR01
Profile picture for user FGR01
Posts
5477
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
AZ US
Fantasy
692nd
FGR01 6/21/2021 12:48pm
6/21/2021 12:48pm
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination.

People just want change for the sake of change sometimes.
10
3

The Shop

See All »
yz133rider
Profile picture for user yz133rider
Posts
4882
Joined
8/1/2013
Location
Avondale, PA US
yz133rider 6/21/2021 1:00pm
6/21/2021 1:00pm
FGR01 wrote:
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination. People just want change for the sake of change...
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination.

People just want change for the sake of change sometimes.
I think the 10-13 yz250f chassis is a step forward and easily could have been made to happen for the 2 strokes.
5
2
outerlimits
Profile picture for user outerlimits
Posts
226
Joined
9/23/2016
Location
San Diego, CA US
outerlimits 6/21/2021 2:35pm
6/21/2021 2:35pm
FGR01 wrote:
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination. People just want change for the sake of change...
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination.

People just want change for the sake of change sometimes.
yz133rider wrote:
I think the 10-13 yz250f chassis is a step forward and easily could have been made to happen for the 2 strokes.
If the 2-stroke was not also designed with a rearward cylinder slant and rear exit exhaust then using that frame would likely mean a fairly compromised rear airbox. Is there even room in the current 250F frame to wedge an air box in back there?
Falcon
Profile picture for user Falcon
Posts
10973
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
Falcon 6/21/2021 4:41pm
6/21/2021 4:41pm
FGR01 wrote:
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination. People just want change for the sake of change...
I don't see the appeal at all. The current 2-stroke chassis/body is much preferable to that abomination.

People just want change for the sake of change sometimes.
yz133rider wrote:
I think the 10-13 yz250f chassis is a step forward and easily could have been made to happen for the 2 strokes.
outerlimits wrote:
If the 2-stroke was not also designed with a rearward cylinder slant and rear exit exhaust then using that frame would likely mean a fairly compromised...
If the 2-stroke was not also designed with a rearward cylinder slant and rear exit exhaust then using that frame would likely mean a fairly compromised rear airbox. Is there even room in the current 250F frame to wedge an air box in back there?
From a 2-stroke guy who rides a 2006 YZ250 and has ridden the 2010, 2012, 2016 and 2020 YZ450Fs, the standard YZ250 frame and bodywork is a far better platform for a 250 2-stroke. Why put the heart of a lion into the body of a blue pig?

Make that 4-stroke radiator/tank junction a lot slimmer and I'd be all for the new design cues, though.
5
2

Post a reply to: 2022 YZ’s